Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Powe
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1957No. Docket 25, Calendar 47,046Published
1ConcurrenceBlack, J.
Aside from and in addition to insistence that there is a “total lack of evidence” tending to support the trial judge’s finding that the driver of the car insured by plaintiff was free from contributory negligence, defendant takes this general position in brief filed here:
“Defendant submits that the record is barren of any evidence that would support any of the following necessary facts: That Willie Powe was driving the defendant’s vehicle; that Willie Powe had granted permission to anyone else to drive the vehicle; *554that the vehicle in which Powe was found was proceeding along highway M-81;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Schneider v. PomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Hett v. DuffyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Schillinger v. WymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Welty Estate v. Wolf EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1956