Legal Opinion
St. Paul Insurance v. Hayes
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 4, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] St. Paul Insurance Company, Holly Gerlaugh, David Shinstrom, and the Maine-Dartmouth Family Practice Residency Program appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Atwood, J.), dismissing their claim against James P. Hayes. We conclude that the trial court did not exceed the bounds of its discretion, and therefore, we affirm the judgment.
[¶ 2] The pending action, brought in 1993 by the St. Paul Insurance Company and its insureds — Holly Gerlaugh, David Shinstrom, and the Maine-Dartmouth Family Practice Residency Program— seeks contribution and/or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Spickler v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Baker's Table, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Harris v. SoleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Colony Cadillac & Oldsmobile, Inc. v. YerdonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Pelletier v. PathirajaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bean v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. John H. BartlettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Selby v. Cumberland CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- State v. McCurdySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Terrence E. Pinkham v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.