Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Werelius

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 1, 1991No. 12812-8-IIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

60 Wn. App. 450 (1991)

803 P.2d 1334

JOHN SCHULTZ, Appellant,

v.

MILDRED WERELIUS, Respondent.

No. 12812-8-II.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

February 1, 1991.

John J. Sinclair, for appellant.

Edward E. Younglove III and Swanson, Parr, Cordes, Younglove, Peeples & Wyckoff, for respondent.

WORSWICK, C.J.

Does the assignee of a purchaser's interest in a real estate contract have standing to commence an action to set aside a forfeiture, when the assignment was made after the notice of intent to forfeit was recorded? The answer plainly is no. We affirm a summary judgment dismissing the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Stewart Carpet Service, Inc. v. Contractors Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. International Commercial Collectors, Inc. v. Mazel Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API