Schultz v. Werelius
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
60 Wn. App. 450 (1991)
803 P.2d 1334
JOHN SCHULTZ, Appellant,
v.
MILDRED WERELIUS, Respondent.
No. 12812-8-II.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
February 1, 1991.
John J. Sinclair, for appellant.
Edward E. Younglove III and Swanson, Parr, Cordes, Younglove, Peeples & Wyckoff, for respondent.
WORSWICK, C.J.
Does the assignee of a purchaser's interest in a real estate contract have standing to commence an action to set aside a forfeiture, when the assignment was made after the notice of intent to forfeit was recorded? The answer plainly is no. We affirm a summary judgment dismissing the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Stewart Carpet Service, Inc. v. Contractors Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- International Commercial Collectors, Inc. v. Mazel Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.