Paschall v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.
Paschall, appearing pro se, appeals from the departure sentence imposed upon him following remand from this court in Paschall v. State, 501 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (Paschall I).
In Paschall I we determined that only one departure ground was valid. We remanded for resentencing because of the invalid reasons. On remand, the trial court sentenced Paschall to the same sentence, *471finding that the one valid ground was sufficient to support the departure.
Paschall contends that the reason for departure has, subsequent to the remand by this court, been declared invalid. The departure…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State v. RousseauSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Booker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Mott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- State v. KassCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990