Seko Air Freight, Inc. v. Direct Transit, Inc.

ORDER

ROSEMOND, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Seko Air Freight (“Seko”) commenced this action on August 23,1993. Seko alleges that defendant Direct Transit was negligent in transporting goods. Seko seeks reimbursement for the goods that were never delivered to their destination due to Direct Transit’s alleged negligence. In its complaint, Seko alleges that this District is proper venue pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 11707. Defendant Direct Transit moves this Court to transfer venue pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 11707(d)(2)(A)(iii). Defendant Direct Transit’s motion to transfer venue is denied.

BAC…