Peirano v. Peirano
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith J.:
This was a proceeding to probate a will. The probate court admitted it to probate. On appeal the district court ordered it admitted to probate. The parties who opposed the probation have appealed to this court.
The petition for probate alleged that one Jamés Peirano was one of the devisees named in the will which was being offered; that the will was duly executed; was valid; that at the time of the execution testator was of full age, of sound mind and not under any restraint, and the testator Andrew Peirano had died on the second day of August,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Drenning v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Pee v. CarlyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Fuller v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- McConnell v. KeirSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Estate of FarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- In Re Estate of RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- In Re Estate of MichauxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Matson v. ChristySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- In re Estate of FieldCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.