Com. v. Metz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 193, Oct. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Philadelphia Co., June T., 1915, No. 513, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth, v. Prank D. Metz. Indictment for making false statement to obtain credit or property. Before Carr, J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 193, Oct. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Philadelphia Co., June T., 1915, No. 513, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth, v. Prank D. Metz. Indictment for making false statement to obtain credit or property. Before Carr, J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty. On a motion for a'new trial and in arrest of judgment, Carr, J., filed the following opinion: The defendant was indicted under the provisions of the Act of 8th May, 1913, P. L. 161, making it a misdemeanor to make or use a false statement or statements in writing, for the purpose of…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The assignments of error filed in this case do not confprm to the rules of this court, and cannot be considered. Bule 16, provides, “When the error assigned is to the admission or rejection of evidence, or to the striking out or refusal to strike out evidence, the specification must quote the questions pr offers, the ruling of the court thereon, and the evidence admitted or rejected, stricken out or which the court refuses to strike out, together with a reference to the page of the paper book or appendix where the matter may be found in its regular order in the printed evidence or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vanderslice v. DonnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Burgess & Town Council of Norristown v. FornanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Commonwealth v. CummingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911