Cyrus Zal v. Cecil Steppe, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
968 F.2d 924
61 USLW 2062
Cyrus ZAL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Cecil STEPPE, Warden; Attorney General of The State of
California, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 91-55579.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 7, 1992.
Decided July 1, 1992.
As Amended July 31, 1992.
Stephen E. Hurst, The Rutherford Institute of California, Cyrus Zal, Encinitas, Cal., pro per., for petitioner-appellant.
David Florance, Deputy County Counsel, San Diego, Cal., for respondents-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
Before: FARRIS, NOONAN, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.