Strehl v. State

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice Morriss

■ Joseph Leo Strehl, III, was convicted by a jury of driving while intoxicated (DWI), third or more, and was sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Strehl argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop and that the evidence is insufficient to establish that he was twice previously convicted of DWI, as alleged in ¿the State’s indictment and as required to establish felony DWI.1 We conclude that, although (1) Strehl failed to preserve his .suppression issue for our…