Legal Opinion
Sampsell v. Gittelman
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1942No. Civ. 13725PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question for determination in this case is whether the state court has jurisdiction to enter judgment for the amount of a turnover order previously entered by the referee in bankruptcy.
On the 21st of March, 1939, upon an involuntary petition, appellant was adjudged a bankrupt. Prior to the filing of such petition he had procured from various creditors, divers and sundry articles of merchandise which he had sold for the sum of $13,592.24. Upon the filing of the involuntary petition, plaintiff was elected trustee of bankrupt’s creditors and thereupon, by reason of his qualification, became…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Frank v. VollkommerSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Cooper v. DasherSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kane v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Fisher v. MedwedeffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944