Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pilgrim v. Clatskanie People's Utility District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 16, 1997No. 94-2121; CA A90883Published

1DissentRiggs, P. J.

I agree with much of what the majority has said in its partial resolution of this appeal. Through a slightly different analysis, I too conclude that elected officials “may” be workers under OAR 839-06-105(4)(a). Because the right to reinstatement provided by ORS 659.415 applies only to a worker who has sustained a compensable injury under the *242terms of the Workers’ Compensation Law, ORS chapter 656, I too conclude that the statutory definition, the cases interpreting it, and its legislative history provide context for the BOLI administrative rule. Ultimately, I too conclude that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Fleischhauer v. BILSTAD, GRAY ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Bush v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Zidell Marine Corp. v. West Painting, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API