Hornaday v. Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Coixrt, Murray County; F; B. Swank, Judge. Action between W. E. Hornaday and others and the Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa and another. From the judgment, the former bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.
This cause was submitted in its regular order on June 8, 1920, and plaintiffs in error given 30 days from that date to file briefs. On July 13, 1920, plaintiffs in error were given 60 days’ additional time to file briefs as per a stipulation filed July 6, 1920, This time having expired, and • no briefs having been filed, nor further extension of time requested, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16, 183 Pac. 880; Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10; Sequoyah Club v. Ward, 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 747; Cantwell et al. v. Patterson et al.,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Balch v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Sequoyah Club v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Guarantee State Bank v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Enid v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Gummere v. ColesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923