Dorman v. State

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was indicted by the grand jury, charged with selling intoxicating liquors, after local option had been adopted.

1. In his first bill of exceptions, appellant complains of the refusal of the court to quash the indictment. The indictment is drawn in accordance with the form frequently approved by this court, and the court did not err in overruling the motion to quash.

2. The State introduced John Lambert, who testified he bought jtwo bottles of whisky from appellant. ' On direct examination he also testified: “I testified before the grand jury in this case, and I first…