People v. Mora
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, a review of the totality of the circumstances (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 413 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]), demonstrates that her oral and written statements to the police were not involuntarily made (see CPL 60.45 [1]). According to the testimony adduced at the Huntley hearing (see People v Huntley, 15 NY2d 72 [1965]), the defendant was afforded Miranda warnings (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]) before giving both her oral and written statements. An interview of the defendant conducted by a detective occurred during the span of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. CaldavadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. LeakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. AlvarengaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.