Legal Opinion
Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1992No. 91-CA-1172PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARMSTRONG, Judge.
This is an appeal from a default judgment rendered against the defendant, Liquid Air Corporation (“Liquid Air”). The plaintiff is the law firm of Sessions & Fish-man.
Sessions & Fishman instituted this action against Liquid Air seeking full payment of attorney’s fees due on an open account for legal services it performed on behalf of Liquid Air. In 1989, Liquid Air retained the services of Sessions & Fishman to defend it in three different lawsuits that were pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
*233After all of the lawsuits were…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Charia v. MungovenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- J. Cohen Jewelers v. Succession of JumonvilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Guillory v. GuilloryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hoskins v. ZieglerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Premier Brands, Inc. v. MartinyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- McGowan v. Warwick Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997