Hazen v. Quimby
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Foreign Attachment. The defendant was defaulted, and a •claimant of the fund in the hands of the trustee appeared. The plaintiff and the defendant agreed in writing that the writ should be amended by striking out the name of the plaintiff and inserting in place thereof the name of another person. The court allowed the amendment, and the trustee and claimant excepted.
1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.
Justice may require the amendment. Judge of Probate v. Jackson, 58 N. H. 458; Folsom v. Insurance Co., 59 N. H. 54; Prescott v. Farmer, 59 N. H. 90; Buckminster v. Wright, 59 N. H. 153; Boudreau v. Eastman, 59 N. H. 467; Chauncy v. Insurance Co., 60 N. H. 428. The case presents no question of law.
Exception overruled.
Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boudreau v. EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Buckminster v. WrightSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Folsom v. Orient Fire Ins.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Chauncy v. German American Ins.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
- Judge of Probate v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Thorndike v. CollinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Tucker v. LakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
- Willoughby v. HoldernessSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1883