Legal Opinion
Stomp, Inc. v. NEATO, LLC
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 6, 1999No. SA CV 99-669 DOC (ANx)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, OR TO DECLINE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, OR TO TRANSFER VENUE
CARTER, District Judge.
Defendant NeatO, LLC (“NeatO”) moves to dismiss this matter under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction, or in the alternative, to decline subject matter jurisdiction or transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The novel question before the Court is whether exercising personal jurisdiction over a defendant, whose only contact with the forum state is the use of the new and emerging technology…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Boschetto v. HansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mink v. AAAA Development LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. Your Store Online, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Donohue v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Audi AG & Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. IzumiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.