Legal Opinion

Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. City of Cudahy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The authorities in this state clearly set forth the rule that the assessor’s valuation is prima facie correct, and will not be set aside in the absence of evidence showing it to be incorrect. State ex rel. Miller v. Thompson, 151 Wis. 184, 138 N. W. 628; State ex rel. Althen v. Klein, 157 Wis. 308, 147 N. W. 373; State ex rel. Kimberly-Clark Co. v. Williams, 160 Wis. 648, 152 N. W. 450; Peninsular Power Co. v. Wisconsin Tax Comm. 195 Wis. 231, 218 N. W. 371.

In this case the attack upon the correctness of the assessment was by the testimony of three real-estate experts, all of whom limited…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. WeiherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Gisholt Machine Co. v. NorsmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State ex rel. Kimberly-Clark Co. v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Pierce v. JodonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State ex rel. Miller v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. International Business Machines Corp. v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Estate of RyersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State ex rel. Collins v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State ex rel. Flambeau Paper Co. v. WindusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State ex rel. North Shore Development Co. v. AxtellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API