Legal Opinion

State v. Mayhue

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 5, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

Plaintiff in error contends that the indictment is wholly insufficient to charge a criminal offense; that the court erred in overruling his motion for a continuance ; that improper instructions were given on behalf of the people; that the State’s Attorney made improper remarks in his argument to the jury; that the verdict is contrary to the evidence; that the punishment inflicted by the court is excessive.-

The abstract of the record gives us no information as to these several matters except as to the evidence. It simply says: “Copy of indictment.” “Instructions given on the part of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Reavely v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HaselwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Bromwell v. Estate of BromwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Thompson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API