State v. Mayhue
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry
Plaintiff in error contends that the indictment is wholly insufficient to charge a criminal offense; that the court erred in overruling his motion for a continuance ; that improper instructions were given on behalf of the people; that the State’s Attorney made improper remarks in his argument to the jury; that the verdict is contrary to the evidence; that the punishment inflicted by the court is excessive.-
The abstract of the record gives us no information as to these several matters except as to the evidence. It simply says: “Copy of indictment.” “Instructions given on the part of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Reavely v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HaselwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Bromwell v. Estate of BromwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Thompson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.