Legal Opinion

Schreiber v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 21, 2002No. SC95000PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

814 So.2d 396 (2002)

Alan H. SCHREIBER, etc., et al., Petitioners,

v.

Robert R. ROWE, Respondent.

No. SC95000.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 21, 2002.

Neil Rose of Bernstein & Chackman, P.A., Hollywood, FL; and James C. Barry of Adams, Coogler, Watson, Merkel, Barry & Kellner, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioners.

Sharon C. Degnan and Diane H. Tutt of Diane H. Tutt, P.A., Plantation, FL, for Respondent.

Thomas E. Warner, Solicitor General, T. Kent Wetherell, II, Deputy Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General, Tallahassee, FL; and Louis F. Hubener, Assistant Attorney General,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Steele v. KehoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Crist v. FL. ASS'N OF CRIM. DEFENSE LAWYERSSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Rowell v. HoltSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  5. Robert Allen Barker v. Donald H. Capotosto and Thomas M. MageeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API