Legal Opinion

Weidner v. Redevelopment Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 1977No. 507PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The court being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, former C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. O’BRIEN, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance which EAGEN, C. J., and POMEROY, J., join. *77ROBERTS, J., files an opinion in support of reversal which NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., join. MANDERINO, J., files an opinion in support of reversal which ROBERTS and NIX, JJ., join.

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE

O’BRIEN, Justice.

Appellants, Alice E. Weidner, widow; James M. Smith, a/k/a James Merritt Smith, single; Alice E. Weidner, Executrix…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scavo v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Community Housing Services, Inc. v. Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. COMMUNITY HS v. Pgh. Urban Red. Auth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re City of Bethlehem, Northampton Cty.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API