Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Stanton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 21, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 10, 1999, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a mail processor for altering a note from his wife’s physician in order to support his claim that he needed to be out of work to care for her. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he lost…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SchienbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of QuackenbushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of NwaozorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re the Claim of MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. New York State Department of Labor v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In re the Claim of LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In re the Claim of ReddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API