Legal Opinion
State v. Naylor
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 17, 1980No. 3036PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, P. J.
Defendant-appellant, Jamie Naylor, was one of four men charged with crimes arising from an unlawful entry into an occupied structure on November 18,1979. Naylor, in connection with this unlawful entry, was indicted for and convicted of the crimes of aggravated burglary (R. C. 2911.11) and forcible rape (R. C. 2907.02). He seeks now to reverse the judgments rendered against him below, contending that the trial court erred to his prejudice in the following respects:
Assignments of Error
“I. The lower court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a severance of defendant’s trial, pursuant to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HairstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. Savage, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002