Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Employment Security Commission v. Skyland Crafts, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1954No. 166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

An “employer” (G.S. 96-8 (f)) is required to mate “contributions” in prescribed amounts (G.S. 96-9 (b)) to the Hnemploy ment Compensation Fund (G-.S. 96-6) on “wages” (Gr.S. 96-8 (n)) for “employment” (Gr.S. 96-8 (g)) for eacb calendar year in wbieb tbe employer is subject to the statute. Gr.S. 96-9 (a).

Basically, the term “employer” means “any employing unit which in each of twenty different weeks within either the current or the preceding calendar year . . . has, or had in employment, eight or more individuals . . .” Gr.S. 96-8 (f) (1). Crafts, Inc., was not an “employer” during the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Employment Security Commission v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New Capitol Bar & Grill Corp. v. Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Stewart v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  3. D S G Corp. v. ShelorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Prentiss Manufacturing Co. v. Mississippi Employment Security CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API