Legal Opinion

De Caccia v. Barrington

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12731PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

George Adam Arnold De Caccia, at the time of his death, was a resident of the county of Alameda. He had been a resident of Oakland, in said county, but at the time of his death, and at the time he made and signed the document hereinafter referred to, and claimed to be his last will and testament, he was a resident of Alameda, in said county. He died on the fifteenth day of February, 1927, and left surviving him as his only heirs at law, Lillian E. Barrington, Arnold De Caccia, Anna Cavanagh, William De Caccia, his children, and Phillis and Millard De Caccia, minor children of a predeceased…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re Estate of SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Estate of BernardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Thorn v. California Academy of SciencesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. In re Estate of BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. In re Estate of RandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Crosby v. Crockeranglo National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Estate of Bower (1938)California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Irving v. Scripps Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API