Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 1, 1911No. 8022 aPublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Prince, J., Sumter, November, 1910. Action by T. N. Griffin against Atlantic Coast Bine Railroad Company. Defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Before Prince, J., Sumter, November, 1910. Action by T. N. Griffin against Atlantic Coast Bine Railroad Company. Defendant appeals. Mr. McLemore cites: Carrier may contract against its liability for loss by fire: 77 S- C. 467; 78 S. C. 103; 33 Cyc. 1330; 85 S. C. 165, 405, 409>; 164 U. S. 403; 175 U. S. 91; 68 S. W. 411; 24 R. R. A. 647; 70 R. R. A. 930. No act of waiver by carrier: 63 S. C. 197; 88 S. C. 221; 70 S. C. 23; 29 Ency. 1095, 1096; 29 Ency. 1097; 76 S. C. 476; 78 S. C. 103; 81 S. C. 567; 87 S. C. 258.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones.

This action was for the recovery of damages for the destruction by fire of certain cotton belonging to- plaintiff, while upon the platform of the defendant company within the limits- of its right of way. There was evidence to- the effect that notice had been given to the plaintiff that the defendant assumed no- risk for cotton so placed, unless same was tendered for immediate shipment, but that such cotton would be entirely at the owner’s risk. The evidence also showed that the cotton in question was placed upon such platform,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yarborough v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charles J. Webb & Sons, Inc. v. Central R. Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API