Legal Opinion

Wayne Perank and Monica Nebeker v. United States

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 16, 2026No. 2:20-cv-00712Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH WAYNE PERANK and MONICA MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER NEBEKER, DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:20-cv-00712-JNP UNITED STATES, District Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendant. Wayne Perank and Monica Nebeker (collectively, the plaintiffs) sued the United States for negligence, alleging that a government project to replace an open-air irrigation canal with an underground pipe interfered with their access to water for their land. Perank also alleged that the contractor that performed the work damaged irrigation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Dean W. Lilly v. Paul R. Fieldstone, M.D., and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API