Legal Opinion

Tetzloff v. May

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 21, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Floyd District Court.- — M. F. Edwards, Judge. Motion to dismiss an appeal, on the ground that the appellant did not authorize the appeal. Opinion states the facts. Motion sustained.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

One branch of this case was before this court in 1911, and a decision rendered by Judge Weaver, *521found in 151 Iowa 441. In that case, it was held that a widow’s statutory right to the payment of her allowance made for her support out of the lands of her deceased husband, is not subject to the lien of an attachment against her husband, levied in his lifetime.

It was again before this court in 1915, and it was again held that the widow’s allowance for support' is entitled to preference over the claims of attaching creditors. 172 Iowa 617.

After these cases were decided, the district court, on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tetzloff v. MaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Tetzloff v. MaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Tetzloff v. MaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AumannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. PenwellMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Garberson v. GarbersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  5. First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas And Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API