United States v. Chan
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), holds that an accused has the right to be tried by a jury from which no “cognizable racial group” has been excluded. A military accused is entitled to the same equal protection under the Fifth Amendment as a part of military due process. United States v. Santiago-Davila, 26 M.J. 880 (C.M.A.1988). Here, as in Batson and Santiago-Davila, the issue is whether the trial judge erred in granting a government peremptory challenge for the purpose of excluding a “cognizable racial group.”
The appellant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. MooreU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. PaigeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986