Legal Opinion

in Re Ford Motor Company and Ken Stoepel Ford, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2014No. 12-1000PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

In this design-defect case, the plaintiff sought to expose potential bias of the defendant’s two testifying experts by inquiring at their depositions into the frequency with which they testified in favor of design-defect defendants. To further explore bias, the plaintiff now seeks to depose a corporate representative of each expert’s employer. We hold that on the facts of this case, the Rules of Civil Procedure do not permit such discovery and we conditionally grant mandamus relief.

This suit arises from injuries plaintiff Saul Morales sustained after a Ford vehicle ran over him. Morales had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Alford Chevrolet-GeoTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Russell v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Ex Parte ShepperdTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re Weir, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. in Re State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. in Re Ramin Siroosian, Chiropractic Doctors Clinic and Tina Yeshigeta, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  4. In Re Bright Health Management, Inc. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
  5. In Re Eric Reyna v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2024

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API