Legal Opinion

Claim of Lane v. Daystrom Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1949Published

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

The controversy here is between insurance carriers as to which shall have the responsibility for a compensation award based on an occupational disease. Here claimant had a ganglion on her left wrist, an occupational disease, which has been found due to her employment.

It was found to have been “ contracted ” before April 30, 1947. During this time the Jamestown Mutual Insurance Company was on the risk. On April 30,1947, the American Motorists Insurance Company, the appellant here, became the carrier.

On November 17, 1947, an operation was performed. This was the “ disablement ”. The award was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Soukup v. Friedman Marble & Slate WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Claim of Larkow v. Standard Mirror Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Matter of Lanzetta v. Allied Decorating Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API