Shull Ex Rel. Shull v. Rigby
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the ease: That a court of equity has the power to order the sale of property belonging to a minor, in a proceeding properly constituted for the purpose, admits of no doubt. Tyson v. Belcher, 102 N. C., 112, 9 S. E., 634; Rackley v. Roberts, 147 N. C., 201, 60 S. E., 975; Settle v. Settle, 141 N. C., 553, 54 S. E., 445.
But what interest does the petitioner own in the locus in quo f Clearly not an unencumbered fee, for during the lifetime of A. Byron Shull the executors and trustees have “the right to cut, sell and in anywise dispose of the standing trees and timber,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rackley v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Dick v. . PitchfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- Settle v. Settle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Shepard v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Shepard v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.