Legal Opinion

Shull Ex Rel. Shull v. Rigby

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1928Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the ease: That a court of equity has the power to order the sale of property belonging to a minor, in a proceeding properly constituted for the purpose, admits of no doubt. Tyson v. Belcher, 102 N. C., 112, 9 S. E., 634; Rackley v. Roberts, 147 N. C., 201, 60 S. E., 975; Settle v. Settle, 141 N. C., 553, 54 S. E., 445.

But what interest does the petitioner own in the locus in quo f Clearly not an unencumbered fee, for during the lifetime of A. Byron Shull the executors and trustees have “the right to cut, sell and in anywise dispose of the standing trees and timber,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rackley v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Dick v. . PitchfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
  3. Settle v. Settle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Shepard v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Shepard v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API