State v. Rutledge
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Senior Judge.
Defense counsel in this criminal prosecution did not at the time challenge the prosecutor for unfair and unprofessional arguments during the State’s summations to the jury. So, although the comments were clearly improper, the defendant is confronted by an obvious preservation problem. Nothing is more basic in the law of appeal and error than the axiom that a party cannot sing a song to us that was not first sung in trial court. We do not subscribe to the plain error rule in Iowa, have been persistent and resolute in rejecting it, and are not at all inclined to yield on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. McCrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- State v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- State v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
3Cited by82 opinions
- State v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- State v. PiperSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Estate of Harris v. Papa John's PizzaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State of Iowa v. Mark Gabriel MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Michael L. Schawitsch v. Jerry Burt, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.