Legal Opinion

James v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 16, 2005No. 3D04-2565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals from the denial of his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. We affirm on the authority of State v. Del Castillo, 890 So.2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(holding that predicate crimes for which defendant received probation and adjudication could be considered for purposes of habitual offender enhancement); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807, 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)(holding that under habitual felony offender statute, “a sentence includes the sanction of probation.”); Render v. State, 742 So.2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(holding that probation is a “sentence” for habitualization purposes).

W…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. McCall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. State v. Del CastilloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Render v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API