Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Hall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 14, 2008No. 1070419Published

1Dissent

I respectfully dissent from the denial of the petition for the writ of certiorari. The petitioners, Antonia M. Hall and Carolyn A. Hall, seek review of the Court of Criminal Appeals' decision under Rule 39(a)(1)(D), Ala. R.App. P., on the basis that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals conflicts with prior decisions.

I do not believe that this petition could properly be denied on the rationale that the petition is procedurally insufficient because the Halls supposedly failed to present in sufficient detail the portions of the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion as to which they assert…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. George A. VallejoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Ex Parte AnonymousSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. State v. CarpenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API