Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Rapid City v. Finn

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2003No. NonePublished

1ConcurrenceSrstka, Circuit Judge

[¶ 26.] I concur in the majority opinion in all respects. I add this opinion to comment on SDCL 21-35-10.1 and our affirming the use of that statute by the trial court to overturn a city’s declaration of taking.

[IT 27.] At first blush our opinion appears to beat a retreat from the traditional deference given by the courts to the legislative branch of the government when it delegates the power of eminent domain. Basin Elec. Power Co-op. v. Payne, 298 N.W.2d 385, 388 (S.D.1980)(citing Otter Tail Power Company v. Malme, 92 N.W.2d 514, 521 (N.D.1958)).

[¶ 28.] The Constitution of South Dakota,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Otter Tail Power Company v. MalmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. City of Bristol v. HorterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. v. MasonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. East Sioux Falls Quarry Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API