Legal Opinion
Flandrow v. Hammond
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1893Published
Action by William H. Flandrow against Henry B. Hammond. The complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff moved for a new trial on exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance at general term, as provided by Code Civil Proc. § 1000.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
In May, 1871, the plaintiff and defendant entered into the following agreement:
“We, the undersigned, Henry B. Hammond and W. H. Flandrow, do agree as follows: Whereas, said Hammond recovered a judgment against the Marine Bank of Chicago, in the supreme court, on November 2,1870, for $1,282.62, in which action an attachment was issued and levied by the sheriff of New York county, upon a judgment recovered by said Marine Bank of Chicago, against Tunis Van Brunt, on March 1, 1867, for $6,858.12, which last-named judgment said Flandrow is desirous of legally acquiring: Now, the said Hammond, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re the Claim of FlandrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- In the Matter of the Claim of FlandrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1883