Legal Opinion

Van Roekel v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 23, 1989No. Docket No. 31448-86UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL W. VAN ROEKEL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Van Roekel v. Commissioner

Docket No. 31448-86.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1989-74; 1989 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 74; 56 T.C.M. (CCH) 1297; T.C.M. (RIA) 89074;

February 23, 1989; As amended February 28, 1989

Robert D. Howard and Kenneth A. Lapatine, for the petitioner.

Michael D. Wilder, Roland Barral, and Gina A. Makoujy, for the respondent.

COHEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

COHEN, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax for 1982, additions to tax, and additional interest as…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Dreicer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  4. Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Grodt & McKay Realty, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bergford v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Whitmire v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
  3. Gerald W. Bergford v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Epsten v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  5. Robert L. Whitmire v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API