Cruikshank v. Cruikshank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Maud Cruikshank, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 24th day of March, 1898, modifying an order theretofore entered, directing the defendant to serve a bill of particulars.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
Upon an application of the plaintiff the defendant was required to serve a bill of particulars in respect of the allegations contained in his amended and supplemental answer. Such bill of particulars was served, and in certain respects the defendant stated that he was not able to specify or designate more specifically the days on which the alleged acts had occurred than he had previously stated in his answer. The penalty attached for failure to comply with the order directing the service of the bill of particulars was that the defendant should be precluded from introducing any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Riggs v. . PursellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Dwight v. . Germania Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Corbin v. Casina Land Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haskell v. MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- People v. CiminoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- McGorie v. McAdooNew York Supreme Court · 1906