In re Vastbinder
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
In Bankruptcy. Demurrer to petition.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBARD, District Judge.
This is a special demurrer, filed by the respondent, calling in question, in several particulars, the sufficiency of the proceedings instituted against him. The first question is as to the verification of the petition. This is made by the attorneys in fact of the petitioning creditors, all of whom are corporations of other states, who swear that they are authorized to institute the proceedings and verify them, and that the statements made therein are true, “to the best of their knowledge, information and belief.” There can be no doubt as to the right of an attorney in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re BellahDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1902
- In re BedingfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1899
- In re GilletteDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1900
- In re Chequasset Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1901
- In re Burlington Malting Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Canute Steamship Co. v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- In re Plymouth Cordage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- In re McGrawDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1918
- Guterman v. C. D. Parker & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- In re SlatkinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.