Legal Opinion

Forstman v. Arluck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 6, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 27, 1978, which denied his motion to proceed to inquest for an assessment of damages and granted defendant Arluck’s cross motion to open his default and to compel plaintiff to accept service of Arluck’s answer; and (2) so much of a further order of the same court, dated December 19, 1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination. Appeal from order dated October 27, 1978 dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Limco Manufacturing Corp. v. Mattiace Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Van Ness v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Gottlieb v. BrodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mayers v. Cadman Towers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Harvard Trust Company v. BraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  3. Forstman v. ArluckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Forstman v. ArluckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API