Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1922No. 8822PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. Punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

Only two witnesses were used by the State. Appellant did not testify and no testimony was offered by the defense. Chauncey Smith testified that he got into a car with appellant and one Cressell in the town of Graham and told appellant he wanted some whiskey, to which appellant replied, “All right;” that they went in appellant’s ear three or four miles from town where appellant went into a pasture and after “scratching” around in the bushes revealed four quart…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holladay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  4. McNeill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API