Daryl Dembiec & a. v. Town of Holderness
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.
The petitioners, Daryl and Marcy Dembiec, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Vaughan, J.) dismissing their petition for equitable relief. The trial court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the petitioners’ municipal estoppel claim because they had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies. The petitioners argue that the trial court had jurisdiction over their claim because they were not required to first raise it before the zoning board of adjustment. We reverse and remand.
In October 2011, the petitioners obtained a permit from the respondent, the Town of Holderness (Town),…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Porter v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Forest County v. GoodeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Fields v. Kodiak City CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- David F. Dietz & a. v. Town of TuftonboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- Carney v. Town of Weare, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017
- New Hampshire Alpha of SAE Trust v. Town of HanoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
- New Hampshire Alpha of SAE Trust v. Town of HanoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
- Soderman v. Shaw'sDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017