Legal Opinion

State v. Dillon

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 3, 2010No. 102,724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

More than 10 years ago, William Dillon was convicted of attempted aggravated indecent solicitation of a child. Beginning in 2003, he was required to register as a sex offender under the Kansas Offender Registration Act. That law requires offenders to periodically report to the sheriff in their county of residence. It originally required the offender to report once during his birth month and then eveiy 6 months thereafter; the legislature amended the law in 2006 to require more frequent reporting—in the offender s birth month and every 4 months thereafter—starting July 1, 2007.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. ShopteeseSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HuertaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API