Utah Copper Co. v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist.

I concur. As stated by the opinion we are not called upon again to review the questions raised in the case of Utah Copper Co. v. Stephen Hayes Estate, Inc., 83 Utah 545, 31 P. (2d) 624. I think it unnecessary in this case to review, interpret, or comment on the propositions set out and decided in that case. The former opinion is clear and is now the law of the case regardless of whether it is thought to be right or wrong. The fact that counsel contend that this court found facts contrary to the findings of the trial court or decided matters not involved in that suit need not here be…