Legal Opinion
Seabolt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 5, 1960No. A-12852Published
1Opinion of the Court
357 P.2d 1014 (1960)
E. S. SEABOLT, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
No. A-12852.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.
October 5, 1960.
Rehearing Denied December 28, 1960.
Daniel Bassett, Bartlesville, for plaintiff in error.
Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
NIX, Judge.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court with the misdemeanor of unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Judgment and sentence was pronounced by the County Court of Washington County on August 28,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. VanceIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Stevens Expert Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. FurmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Klein v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1905
- People v. WilmotIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.