Progressive Halcyon Insurance Co. v. Petty
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRONE, Judge.
Case Summary
Progressive Halcyon Insurance Company (“Progressive”) appeals the denial of its motion for summary judgment and the granting of the motions for summary judgment filed by Michael Petty and Autumn Petty on the issue of whether Michael and Autumn are entitled to underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage under Autumn’s policy with Progressive (“the Policy”). We reverse and remand with instructions to enter summary judgment in Progressive’s favor.
Issue
Are Michael and Autumn entitled to UIM coverage under the Policy?
Facts and Procedural History 1
The relevant facts are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Hinshaw v. Board of Com'rs of Jay CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Corr v. American Family InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Merry Clark, on Behalf of and as Next Friend of A.C., Minor, and S.C., Minor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lakes v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Lakes v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011