Legal Opinion
Bowling v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 2018No. CA 18-169; consolidated with CA 18-170; CA 18-171; CA 18-172; CA 18-173; CA 18-174; CA 18-175; CA 18-176; CA 18-179Published
1Opinion of the Court
Robert E. Landry, Patrick D. Gallaugher, Kevin P. Fontenot, Scofield, Gerard, Pohorelsky, Gallaugher & Landry, 901 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 900, Lake Charles, LA 70601, (337) 433-9436, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: Citgo Petroleum Corporation
Craig Isenberg, Kyle W. Siegel, Joshua O. Cox, Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver, LLC, 909 Poydras, 24th Floor, New Orleans, LA 70112, (504) 589-9700, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT APPELLANT: Citgo Petroleum Corporation
Wells T. Watson, Jake D. Buford, Baggett, McCall, Burgess, Watson & Gaughan, P.O. Drawer 7820, Lake Charles, LA 70606-7820, (337)…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.