Legal Opinion

Finke v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2007No. 45A03-0606-CV-280PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

William and Ruth Finke appeal following the entry of summary judgment in favor of Town of Highland (the Town) and Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO) on the Finkes’ prescriptive easement claim. On appeal, the Finkes present the following restated issues for review:

1. Did the Finkes timely file their notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 41(A)?

2. Did the trial court properly grant summary judgment in favor of the Town and NIPSCO?

We affirm.

On October 1, 2002, the Finkes filed a Complaint to Declare Prescriptive Easement and a separate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brattain v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Lenhardt Tool & Die Company v. LumpeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Principal Life Insurance Co. v. NeedlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Cole v. Lantis Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Marriage of Graddick v. GraddickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ron Shoemaker v. Indiana State Police DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Cheng Song v. Thomas Iatarola and Theresa IatarolaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Finke v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Agav Properties, Avrohem Tkatch, and Elisheva Tkatch v. The City of South Bend and The South Bend Fire DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Bennie Truth v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API