Legal Opinion

Latta v. Otter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2015No. Nos. 14-35420, 14-35421, 12-17668PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, joined by RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc:

One month after the panel in these cases struck down the traditional marriage laws of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Lathon v. MeisnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  3. Marta Barany v. County of Contra Costa, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API